<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>wear debris characterization Archives | Tesibis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tesibis.com/tag/wear-debris-characterization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tesibis.com/tag/wear-debris-characterization/</link>
	<description>Consulting &#38; Expert Testimony on Lubrication &#38; Oil Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 23:36:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Deciphering Important Visual Features of Wear Particles</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/1-deciphering-important-visual-features-of-wear-particles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wear Debris Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debris field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrographic analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Particle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear particle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When working from a single sample, it is common for labs to classify wear particles according to standardized shapes such as platelets, chunks, ribbons and spheres. T</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/1-deciphering-important-visual-features-of-wear-particles/">Deciphering Important Visual Features of Wear Particles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Machinery Lubrication Magazine</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="324" height="296" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-42.png" alt="" class="wp-image-641" srcset="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-42.png 324w, https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-42-300x274.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 324px) 100vw, 324px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When working from a single sample, it is common for labs to classify wear particles according to standardized shapes such as platelets, chunks, ribbons and spheres. The task of deriving meaning from the number and size of particles in the different classifications is much more difficult. Condition monitoring is not about science &#8211; it’s about understanding and reporting what is happening, why it’s happening, where it’s happening, and how severe or threatening the condition might be. This can be a daunting task, to say the least, especially if you are not being assisted by a particle-counting technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lubricant co-exists with the machine and has an active presence in its critical frictional zones. As such, the progression of wear-related machine failures does not go unnoticed by the lubricant. The byproducts of wear and surface damage become suspended in the lubricant, embedded in the filter, or stratified as sediment in nooks and crannies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As failure advances, most wear modes produce more particles, and some also produce larger particles. In certain cases, what was thought to be an advanced failure state may suddenly appear benign or in decline. There are reasons for this, so do not be fooled. The wounds and excavations from wear do not heal over on their own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The time has come to increase the specificity of wear particle characterization. The four basic shapes were a good start, but there is much more we can learn and apply. For those who understand vibration, imagine being limited to vibration overalls or only what is produced in the low-frequency velocity spectrum. Likewise, thermal imaging has shown us how to look far beyond discrete temperature values or trends. This analogy applies to wear debris analysis as well. The appearance of particles holds many clues that generally go unnoticed or are just not understood.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/32037/deciphering-visual-features-wear-particles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/1-deciphering-important-visual-features-of-wear-particles/">Deciphering Important Visual Features of Wear Particles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best Practices in Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-best-practices-in-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wear Debris Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesive wear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elemental spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impaction testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear mode]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The analysis of power train lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a well developed practiced in mobile equipment applications.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-best-practices-in-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/">Best Practices in Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Proceedings of the International Conference on Condition Monitoring, University of Wales Swansea</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="264" height="200" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-36.png" alt="" class="wp-image-617"/></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The analysis of power train lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a well developed practiced in mobile equipment applications. However, these same techniques don&#8217;t always transfer successfully into stationary equipment applications for many users. In recent years new approaches and techniques have been perfected to substantially improve the detection of incipient and developing faults in bearings and gear units using wear debris analysis. The approach is more systemic as opposed to the application of any singular new or emerging technology. It begins with improvements in the sampling process to enrich the data and proceeds through the use of tactics that strengthen the signal-to-noise ratio. After detection is confirmed, the final analytical phase involves wear particle identification using both classic and advanced techniques. Key Words: wear debris analysis, spectroscopy, wear particles, ferrography, fault detection, predictive maintenance, tribology, wear particle identification, oil analysis, condition monitoring, elemental analysis, ferrous density, microscopic analysis, ferrometrics.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button is-style-tesibis-outline-blue-blue"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://tesibis.com/pdf/articles/Maximizing-Fault-Detection-in-Rotating-Equipment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full paper</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-best-practices-in-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/">Best Practices in Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wear Debris Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesive wear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elemental spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impaction testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear mode]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The analysis of power train lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a well developed practice in mobile equipment applications. However, these same techniques don't always transfer successfully into stationary equipment applications for many users.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/">Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="219" height="133" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-38.png" alt="" class="wp-image-626"/></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The analysis of power train lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a well developed practice in mobile equipment applications. However, these same techniques don&#8217;t always transfer successfully into stationary equipment applications for many users.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent years new approaches and techniques have been advanced to substantially improve the detection of incipient and developing faults in bearings and gear units using wear debris analysis. The approach is more systemic as opposed to the application of any singular new or emerging technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It begins with improvements in the sampling process to enrich the data and proceeds through the use of specific strategies and tactics. After detection is confirmed, the final analytical phase involves wear particle identification using both classic and advanced techniques.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button is-style-tesibis-outline-blue-blue"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/69/rotating-equipment-wear-debris" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-maximizing-fault-detection-in-rotating-equipment-using-wear-debris-analysis/">Maximizing Fault Detection in Rotating Equipment Using Wear Debris Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tactics For Identifying Wear Metal and Solid-particle Suspensions</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-tactics-for-identifying-wear-metal-and-solid-particle-suspensions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wear Debris Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blotter spot test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elemental analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrous density analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtergram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravimetric analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micropatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonferrous particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patch test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfated ash procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The most widely used laboratory methods for initial detection of abnormal levels of wear debris in used oils include elemental analysis, ferrous density analysis (DR, etc.), particle counting and patch testing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-tactics-for-identifying-wear-metal-and-solid-particle-suspensions/">Tactics For Identifying Wear Metal and Solid-particle Suspensions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="330" height="161" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-40.png" alt="" class="wp-image-633" srcset="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-40.png 330w, https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-40-300x146.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 330px) 100vw, 330px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most widely used laboratory methods for initial detection of abnormal levels of wear debris in used oils include elemental analysis, ferrous density analysis (DR, etc.), particle counting and patch testing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For some users, because of the criticality of their machines, all of these screening tests for wear metals are integrated into the routine test slate. In such cases, when sampling is done correctly, it would be rare for the abnormal production of wear metals to go undetected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, when only one or two of these methods are routinely deployed, there is a distinct risk that an incipient (early stage) failure condition may be overlooked or dismissed as inconsequential.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button is-style-tesibis-outline-blue-blue"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/1766/wear-metal-solid-particle" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-tactics-for-identifying-wear-metal-and-solid-particle-suspensions/">Tactics For Identifying Wear Metal and Solid-particle Suspensions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Benefits of Using Wear Debris Analysis in Industrial Machinery</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-the-benefits-of-using-wear-debris-analysis-in-industrial-machinery/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Wear Debris Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adhesive wear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elemental spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impaction testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle shape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear severity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The analysis of powertrain lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a useful practice in mobile equipment applications. Unfortunately for many users, these techniques don't always transfer successfully into stationary equipment applications. In recent years, new approaches and techniques have been advanced to improve the detection of incipient and developing faults in bearings and gear units using wear debris analysis.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-the-benefits-of-using-wear-debris-analysis-in-industrial-machinery/">The Benefits of Using Wear Debris Analysis in Industrial Machinery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="329" height="122" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-39.png" alt="" class="wp-image-630" srcset="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-39.png 329w, https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-39-300x111.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 329px) 100vw, 329px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The analysis of powertrain lubricants for the purpose of detecting faults and abnormal wear patterns is a useful practice in mobile equipment applications. Unfortunately for many users, these techniques don&#8217;t always transfer successfully into stationary equipment applications. In recent years, new approaches and techniques have been advanced to improve the detection of incipient and developing faults in bearings and gear units using wear debris analysis.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As opposed to the application of any singular new or emerging technology, these new methods are more systematic and functional. It begins with improvements in the sampling process to enrich the data and proceeds through the use of specific strategies and tactics. After detection is confirmed, the final analytical phase involves wear particle identification using both classic and advanced techniques.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like so many endeavors, success depends more on the quality of execution than the strength of the underlying technologies. This idea can be concluded from the fact that while a great deal of new knowledge and technology has been advanced, for the vast majority of industrial organizations employing wear debris analysis, little has changed in either their tools or approach.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button is-style-tesibis-outline-blue-blue"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/1390/wear-debris-analysis-industrial" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/wear-debris-analysis/2-the-benefits-of-using-wear-debris-analysis-in-industrial-machinery/">The Benefits of Using Wear Debris Analysis in Industrial Machinery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of the Patch.  Comparing Particle Analysis Methods</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/particle-contamination/4-the-power-of-the-patch-comparing-particle-analysis-methods/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Particle Contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle counter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle counting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patch ferrography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear debris characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear particle analysis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The practice of transferring suspended particles to the surface of a membrane for analysis has been around for decades. It is perhaps the earliest method for inspecting solid contaminants and wear debris in a used sample of oil. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/particle-contamination/4-the-power-of-the-patch-comparing-particle-analysis-methods/">The Power of the Patch.  Comparing Particle Analysis Methods</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine</p>



<div class="wp-block-group is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-f69d0cc1 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="145" height="109" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-44.png" alt="" class="wp-image-648"/></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="159" height="109" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-45.png" alt="" class="wp-image-649"/></figure>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practice of transferring suspended particles to the surface of a membrane for analysis has been around for decades. It is perhaps the earliest method for inspecting solid contaminants and wear debris in a used sample of oil. It is of no surprise that these methods have enduring use today. In fact, some are the basis of recently adopted standardized methods by ASTM and ISO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While membrane-based procedures for preparing particles for analysis can be time consuming and messy (usually involving the use of glassware and solvents), the benefits can be substantial compared to alternative methods. The main advantage is the ability to both quantitatively and qualitatively describe particle contamination, depending on the method used. As in the case of microscopic particle counting, you see what you’re counting and can confirm visually what appears to be a particle. You can also characterize particle type (e.g., dirt, wear debris, rust, fibers, etc.).</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/28424/power-patch-particle-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read Full Article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/particle-contamination/4-the-power-of-the-patch-comparing-particle-analysis-methods/">The Power of the Patch.  Comparing Particle Analysis Methods</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
