<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>failure factors Archives | Tesibis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tesibis.com/tag/failure-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tesibis.com/tag/failure-factors/</link>
	<description>Consulting &#38; Expert Testimony on Lubrication &#38; Oil Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:45:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Be Proactive to Avoid Root Cause Fault Bubbles</title>
		<link>https://tesibis.com/rca-and-failure-analysis/2-be-proactive-to-avoid-root-cause-fault-bubbles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[RCA & Failure Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condition monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticality analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure modes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault modes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proactive maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short P-F interval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden death failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symptom detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://tesibis.com/?p=1081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No warning or short-warning failures are the worst kind. Think of a tire. It can wear out slowly over thousands of driving miles or rupture suddenly, at full highway speed, from a random piece of road debris. You can monitor tread loss over time and conveniently schedule a tire change. Conversely, who could predict the sudden appearance of a sharp piece of iron?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/rca-and-failure-analysis/2-be-proactive-to-avoid-root-cause-fault-bubbles/">Be Proactive to Avoid Root Cause Fault Bubbles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Jim Fitch<br>Machinery Lubrication Magazine</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img decoding="async" width="350" height="140" src="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-140.png" alt="" class="wp-image-1082" srcset="https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-140.png 350w, https://tesibis.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-140-300x120.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px" /></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No warning or short-warning failures are the worst kind. Think of a tire. It can wear out slowly over thousands of driving miles or rupture suddenly, at full highway speed, from a random piece of road debris. You can monitor tread loss over time and conveniently schedule a tire change. Conversely, who could predict the sudden appearance of a sharp piece of iron?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fault bubbles are sudden-death conditions in waiting. They haven’t ruptured, but they are about to. Similar to a tire, fault bubbles can burst instantly. Unlike the tire, most fault bubbles in industrial machinery can be revealed by condition monitoring, which includes the careful examination by a skilled inspector. Once detected, the root cause can be arrested or at least mitigated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In past columns, I’ve mentioned the P-F interval. As a review, “P” is the point at which a failure (in progress) is first detected, while “F” is the end point of functional inoperability. Although the P-F interval is a theoretical concept that has useful application, it is rarely applied in real-world machines. This is because the real world comes with many variable events. These events distort the predictability of the P-F interval.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button is-style-tesibis-outline-blue-blue"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/30834/root-cause-fault-bubbles" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read the full article</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://tesibis.com/rca-and-failure-analysis/2-be-proactive-to-avoid-root-cause-fault-bubbles/">Be Proactive to Avoid Root Cause Fault Bubbles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tesibis.com">Tesibis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
